Bibliográfia Empedoklészhez

A Wikipédiából, a szabad enciklopédiából
Empedoklész
Empedoklész

Ez az oldal az Empedoklész iránt érdeklődők részére gyűjti össze a felhasználható irodalmat. A következő művek Empedoklésszal kapcsolatos tanulmányokat, elemzéseket tartalmaznak:

Irodalom[szerkesztés]

  • Arundel, M. R. (=Wright) "Empedocles fr. 35, 12-15" Classical Review 12 (1962) pp. 109–111.
  • Babut, D. "Sur l’unité de la pensée d’Empédocle" Philologus 120 (1976), pp. 139–164.
  • Barnes, H. E. "Unity in the Thought of Empedocles" Classical Journal 63 (1967), pp. 18–23.
  • Barnes, J. The Presocratic Philosophers 2 vols. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979.
  • Barnes, J. Review of Wright Empedocles: The Extant Fragments in Classical Review 32 (1982), pp. 191–196.
  • Bauer, J. B. "Monie. Empedokles B24.4 und 28.3" Hermes 89 (1961), pp. 367–369.
  • Bergk, T. Commentario de Prooemio Empedoclis. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1839.
  • Bergk, T. Kleine Schriften, II. Halle, 1886.
  • Betegh, G. The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation; Cambridge University Press (September 6, 2004)
  • Bicknell, P. J. "The Shape of the Cosmos in Empedocles" Parola del Passato 23 (1968), pp. 118–119.
  • Bidez, J. La Biographie d’Empédocle. Ghent: Clemm, 1894.
  • Bies, J. Empédocle d’Agrigente. Paris: Villain and Belhomme, 1969.
  • Bignone, E. Empedocle: Studio Critico. Turin: Bocca, 1916.
  • Bing, P. "The Voice of Those Who Live in the Sea: Empedocles and Callimachus" Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 41 (1981), pp. 33–36.
  • Blass, F. "Zu Empedokles" Jahrbuch für classisches Philologie 127 (1883), pp. 19–26.
  • Blumenthal, H. J. "Empedocles fr 17.19-20" Gräzer Beiträge 3 (1975), pp. 21–29.
  • Bodrero, E. Il Principio fondamentale del sistema di Empedocle. Rome: Loescher, 1904.
  • Bollack, J. "Die Metaphysik des Empedocles" Philologus 101 (1957), pp. 30–54.
  • Bollack, J. "Empédocle ou l’ancienne physique" L’Information Littéraire 17 (1965), pp. 203–207.
  • Bollack, J. Empédocle. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit 1965-1969.
  • Bollack, J. "Le Proéme du peri phuseos d’Empédocle" Revue des Études Grecques 72 (1959), pp. 15–16.
  • Bollack, J. "Les Zones de la cosmogonie d’Empédocle" Hermes 96 (1968), pp. 239–240.
  • Bollack, J. "Lukrez und Empedokles" Die Neue Rundschau 70 (1959), pp. 656–686.
  • Bollack, J. "Lukrez 1, 1114-17 und Empedokles Fr 110" Philologus 104 (1960), pp. 295–298.
  • Bollack, Mayotte. "La Chaîne aimantine, Lucrèce et ses modèles grecs" Revue des Études latines 41 (1963), pp. 165–185.
  • Booth, N. "Empedocles Account of Breathing" Journal of Hellenic Studies 80 (1960), pp. 10–15.
  • Booth, N. "Aristotle on Empedocles B100" Hermes 103 (1975), pp. 373–375.
  • Booth, N. "A Mistake to Be Avoided in the Interpretation of Empedocles" Journal of Hellenic Studies 96 (1976), pp147–148.
  • Boussoulas, N. "Essai sur la structure du mélange dans la pensée presocratiques: Empedocles" Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 63 (1958), pp. 135–148.
  • Boussoulas, N. "La structure du mélange dans la pensée antique" Sophia 28 (1960), pp380–396.
  • Brink, C. O. "Horace and Empedocles’ Temperature: A Rejected Fragment of Empedocles" Phoenix 23 (1969), pp. 138–142.
  • Brown, G. "The Cosmological Theory of Empedocles" Apeiron 18 (1974), pp. 97–101.
  • Brown, R. D. "Lucretian Ridicule of Empedocles" Classical Quarterly 33 (1983), pp. 146–160.
  • Brun, J. Empédocle ou la philosophe de l’amour et de la haine. Paris: Seghers, 1966.
  • Buhl, M. S. Untersuchungen zu Sprache und Stil des Empedokles. Unpublished dissertation. Heidelberg, 1956 (160p).
  • Burkert, W. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972.
  • Burkert, W. "Plotin, Plutarch, und die Platonisierende Interpretation von Heraklit und Empedokles" pp. 137–146 in Kephalaion ed. J. Mansfield and L. M. de Rijk. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1975.
  • Burnet, John: Greek philosophy, Chapter V. Empedocles of Akragas; MacMillan And CO., Limited, London 1928;
  • Andriopoulos, D.Z. "Empedocles’ Theory of Perception’ Platon 24 (1972), pp. 290–98.
  • Calogero, Guido. "L’eleatismo di Empedocle" Studii in onore di Luigi Castiglioni. Florence: G. C. Sansoni, 1960. pp. 127–167.
  • Cataudella, Q. "Empedoclea" Revista de Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 38 (1960), pp. 124–132.
  • Charlton, W. Aristotle’s Physics I, II.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.
  • Cooper, John. "Aristotle’s Natural Teleology" pp. 197–222 in Language and Logos, ed. M. Schofield and M. C. Nussbaum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  • Cornford, F. M. Principium Sapientiae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952.
  • Crönert, W. "De Loborno Argivo" pp. 123–145 in Charites (Festschrift F. Leo) Berlin: Weidmann, 1911.
  • Darcus, S. M. "Daimon Parallels the Holy Phren in Empedocles" Phroenesis 22 (1977), pp. 175–190.
  • Defradas, J. "Un Nouvel Empédocle?" Revue des Études Grecques 86 (1973), pp. 212–223.
  • De Ley, H. "Empedocles’ Sexual Theory: A Note on fragment B 63" L’Antiquité Classique 47 (1978), pp. 153–162.
  • Demand, N. "Pindar’s Olympian 2,Theon’s Faith, and Empedocles Katharmoi " Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 16 (1975), pp. 347–357.
  • Detienne, M. "La démonologie d’Empédocles" Revue des Études Grecques 72 (1959), pp. 1–17.
  • Diarmid, J. B. "Theophrastus on the Presocratic Causes" Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 51 (1953), pp. 85–156.
  • Diels, H. Doxographi Graeci. Berlin: 1879 (repr. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1965).
  • Diels, H. "Gorgias und Empedokles" Sitzungsberichte der Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften 49 (1884), pp. 343–368.
  • Diels, H. "Stobias und Aëtios" Rheinisches Museum 36 (1881), pp. 343–350.
  • Diels, H. "Studia Empedoclea" Hermes 15 (1880), pp. 161–179.
  • Diels, H. "Über ein Fragment des Empedokles" Sitzungsberichte der Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften 62 (1897), pp. 1062–1073.
  • Diels, H. "Über die Gedichte des Empedokles" Sitzungsberichte der Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften 63 (1898), pp. 396–415.
  • Diels, H. "Symbola Empedoclea" pp. 125–130 in Mélanges H. Weil Paris: A. Fontemoing, 1898.
  • Diels, H. and Kranz, W. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker 6th ed. Berlin: Weidmann, 1951.
  • Diogenes Laertius' Lives of the Philosophers; Translated by C. D. Yonge (London: Henry G. Bohn, 1853).
  • Drossart Lulofs, H. J. "Aristotle’s T cefe" Journal of Hellenic Studies 77 pt. 1 (1957), pp. 75–80.
  • Dyer, R. "Empedocles fr. 64(= Plut. NQ 21 917é)" Mnemosyne 27 (1974), pp. 175–176.
  • Étienne, H. Poesis philosophica, uel saltem reliquiae poesis philosophicae, Empedoclis, Parmenidis, Xenophanis…, item Heracliti et Democriti loci quidam…Paris, 1573.’
  • Flashar, H. "Empedokles Frgm. B111 und seine Stellung im Lehrgedicht" pp. 547–551 in Actes de la XIIe conference internationale d’études classiques 1975.
  • Förster, A. "Empedocleum" Hermes 74 (1939), pp. 102–104.
  • Fränkl, H. "Homerische Wörter" Antidoron, Festschrift Wackernagel. Göttingen, 1923. pp. 274–282.
  • Frenkian, A. "Theophrast De Sensu Kap 10" Philologus 107 (1963), p. 313.
  • Furley, D. Empedocles and the Clepsydra" Journal of Hellenic Studies 77(1957), pp. 31–34.
  • Furley, D. Variations on a Theme by Empedocles in Lucretus’ Poem" BICS 17 (1970), pp. 55–64.
  • Furley, D. "Notes on Parmenides" pp. 1–15 in Exegesis and Argument ed. E. Lee, A. Mourelatos, and R. Rorty. New York: 1973 (=Phroenesis Supp. Vol. I).
  • Furley, D. J. and R. E. Allen, eds. Studies in Presocratic Philosophy. Vol 1: The Beginnings of Philosophy. London, 1970.
  • Furley, D. J. and R. E. Allen, eds. Studies in Presocratic Philosophy. Vol. 2. Eleatics and Pluralists. London, 1975.
  • Furley, D. J. and R. E. Allen, eds. Essays on Greek and Roman Philosophy of Nature. Cambridge, 1989.
  • Furth, M. "Elements of Eleatic Ontology" Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (1968), pp. 111–132; repr. In A. Mourelatos, ed. The Pre-Socratics pp. 241–270.
  • Gallavotti, C. "Alcune frasi di Empedocle interpretate con i criteri di Aristotele" Rendiconti della Classe di Scienze Morali storiche e filologiche dell’ Accademia dei Lincei 28 (1973), pp. 773–792.
  • Gallivotti, C. "Il proemio di Empedocle" Helikon XIII-XIV (1973-1974), pp. 7–34.
  • Gallivotti, C. "Il punto geometrico e l’Uno di Empedocle nel trattato peripatetico della linea indivisible" Rendiconti della Classe di Scienze Morali storiche e filologiche dell’Accademia dei Lincei 29 (1974), pp. 381–394.
  • Gallivotti, C. Empedocle: Poema fisico e lustrale. Mondadori, 1975.
  • Gallivotti, C. "Empedocle nei papyri ercolanesi" pp. 153–161 in Le monde grec ed. J. Bingen, G. Cambier, and G. Nachtergal. Brussels: Ed. de l’Université libre de Bruxelles, 1975.
  • Gallivotti, C. " La critica di Empedocle in Diogene di Enoande" Museum Criticum X-XII (1975-1977), pp. 243–249.
  • Gallivotti, C. "Da Stesicoro ad Empedocle" Kokalos 26-27 (1980-1981), pp. 413–433.
  • Gallop, D. Plato:Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
  • Gallop, D. Parmenides of Elea: Fragments. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1984.
  • Gerke, H. Sprache und Stil des Empedokles. Unpublished dissertation. Göttingen, 1953 (115 p).
  • Gladisch, A. Empedokles und die Aegypter. Leipzig, 1858.
  • Gomperz, T. "Zu Empedokles" Hermes 31 (1896), pp. 469–474.
  • Graham, D. W. "Symmetry in the Empedoclean Cycle" Classical Quarterly 38 (1988), pp. 297–312.
  • Grotius, Hugo. Dicta poetarum quae apud Io. Stobaeum exstant, emendata et latino carmine reddita ab H. G., (accesserunt…). Paris, 1623.
  • Greek Thinkers: A History of Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 1, Chapter 5. translated by Laurie Magus (London: John Murray, 1920)
  • Guthrie, W. K. C. A History of Greek Philosophy vols. 1-2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962, 1965.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. Vorlesungungen üdie Geschichte der Philosophie. First published as vols. 13-15 (1833-36) of Hegel’s Werke, ed. by Karl Ludwig Michelet et alii, published by Duneker und Humboldt, Berlin, 1832-45.
  • Hershbell, J. P. "Empedocles’ Oral Style" Classical Journal 63 (1968), pp. 352–357.
  • Hershbell, J. P. "Hesiod and Empedocles" Classical Journal 65 (1970), pp. 145–161.
  • Hershbell, J. P. "Plutarch as Source for Empedocles Reexamined" American Journal of Philology 92 (1971), pp. 156–184.
  • Hershbell, J. P. "Hippolytus’ Elenchus as Source for Empedocles Reexamined" Phronesis 18 (1973), pp. 97–114,187-203.
  • Hershbell, J. P. "Empedoclean Influences on the Timaeus" Phoenix 28 (1974), pp. 145–166.
  • Hershbell, J. P. "The Idea of Strife in Early Greek Thought" The Personalist 53 (1974), pp. 205–215.
  • Hölscher, U. "Welzeiten und Lebenzyklus: Eine Nachprüfing der Empedokles-Doxographie" Hermes 93 (1965), pp. 7–33.
  • Hunger, H. "Palimpsest Fragmentum aus Herodians Katholike Prosoidia" Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantischen Gesellscchaft 16 (1967), pp. 1–33.
  • Huxley, G. "Aristotle’s Interest in Biography" Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 15 (1974), pp. 203–213.
  • Inwood, B. The Poem of Empedocles: A Text with an Introduction. Toronto/Buffalo/London, 1992.
  • Janko, R. "Hesychius (216 and Empedocles Fragment 21.6" Classical Philology 81 (1986), pp. 308–309.
  • Jobst, Fr. "Über das Verhältnis zwischen Lucretius und Empedokles" Dissertation. Munich: Erlangen, 1907.
  • Jouanna, J. "Présence d’Empédocle dans la Collection Hippocratique" Bulletin d’Association G. Budé 20 (1961), pp. 452–463.
  • Kafka, G. "Zu Theophrasts de sensu" Philologus 72 (1913), pp. 65–82.
  • Kafka, G. "Zur Physikk des Empedokles" Philologus 78 (1923), pp. 202–230.
  • Kahn, C. Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmogony. New York: Columbia University Press, 1960; 2nd ed., Philadelphia, Centrum, 1985.
  • Kahn, C. "Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrines of the Soul"
  • Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42 (1960), pp. 3–35; repr. In A. Mourelatos, ed. The Pre-Socratics, pp. 426–456.
  • Kahn, C. Review of J. Bollack Empédocle vol. 1 in Gnomon 41 (1969), pp. 439–447.
  • Kahn, C. H. "Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrine of the Soul" in A. Mourelatos, ed., The Pre-Socratics. A collection of Critical Essays, 2nd edition with editor’s addenda Princeton, 1993; 1st edition New York, 1974.
  • Karsten, S. Empedoclis Agrigentini Carminum Reliquiae. Amsterdam: J. Mueller, 1838.
  • Kingsley, P. Ancient Philosophy, Mystery and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford/New York, 1995.
  • Kingsley P. "Empedocles and His Interpreters: the Four Element Doxography" Phronesis 39 (1994), pp. 235–254.
  • Kingsley, P. "Empedocles’ Sun" Classical Quarterly 44 (1994), pp. 316–324.
  • Kingsley, P. "On the Teaching of Empedocles" Unpublished Cambridge M. Litt. Dissertation, 1979.
  • Kirk, G. S. Heraclitus: The Cosmic Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954.
  • Kirk, G. S., J. E. Raven, and M. Schofield. The Presocratic Philosophers 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • Kirwan, C. Aristotle’s Metaphysics Books, 0. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.
  • Knatz, F. "Zu Empedoclea" in Schedae philologae H. Usener a sodalibus…oblatae. Bonn, 1891. pp. 1–9.
  • Kranz, W. Empedocles, Antike, Gestalt und Romantische Neuschöpfung. Zurich: 1949.
  • Kranz, W. "Empedokles und die Atomistik" Hermes 47 (1912), pp. 18–42.
  • Kranz, W. "Lukrez und Empedokles" Philoologus 96 (1943), pp. 68–107.
  • Kranz, W. "Vorsokratisches 3. Die Katharmoi und die Physika des Empedokles" Hermes 70 (1935), pp. 111–119.
  • La Croce, E. "Empedocles’ Sphairos and Parmenidean Legacy" Platon 32-33 (1980-1981), pp. 114–122.
  • Lasserre, F. "Trois nouvelles citations poétiques" Museum Helveticum 26 (1969), pp. 80–83.
  • Last, H. "Empedokles and His Klepsydra Again" Classical Quarterly 18 (1924), pp. 169–173.
  • Lazzeri, M. "Un verso di Empedocle Fr. 10 Diels" Bolletino dei Classici 3a, ser. 1 (1980), pp. 25–28.
  • Lesher, J. H. "Parmenides Critique of Thinking: the pouludêris elenchon of fragment 7" Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2 (1984), pp. 1–30.
  • Lloyd, A. H. "The Coin Types of Selinus and the Legend of Empedocles" The Numismatic Chronicle 15 (1935), pp. 73–93.
  • Lloyd-Jones, H. "Pindar and the After-Life" pp. 245–283 in Pindare: Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique vol. 31. Genève: Fondation Hardt, 1985.
  • Loenen, J. H. M. M. Parmenides, Melissus, Gorgias. Assen, 1951.
  • Lombardo, S Parmenides and Empedocles; Grey Fox Press (April 1982)
  • Lommatzsch, B. H. C. Die Weisheit des Empedocles nach ihren Quellen…philosophisch bearbeit…, Berlin, 1830.
  • Long, A. A. "The Principles of Parmenides Cosmogony" Phronesis 8 (1963), pp. 90–107; repr. in R. E. Allen and D. Furley, eds., Studies in Presocratic Philosophy vol. 2, cp. 3. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975.
  • Long, A. A. "Thinking and Sense-Perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism" Classical Quarterly 16 (1966), pp. 256–276.
  • Long, A.A. "Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle in the Sixties" pp. 397–425 in A. Mourelatos, ed., The Pre-Socratics. A collection of Critical Essays, 2nd edition with editor’s addenda Princeton, 1993; 1st edition New York, 1974.
  • Long, H. S. "The Unity of Empedocles’ Thought" American Journal of Philology 70 (1949), pp. 142–158.
  • Longrigg, J. "Galen on Empedocles (fr. 67)" Philologus 108(1964), pp. 297–300.
  • Longrigg, J. "Empedocles’ Fiery Fish" Journal of the Warburg Institute 28 (1965), pp. 314–315.
  • Longrigg, J. "Teff 0ef" Classical Quarterly 15 (1965), pp. pp. 249–251.
  • Longrigg, J. "Roots" Classical Review 17 (1967), pp. 1–4.
  • Longrigg, J. "Empedocles’ Fertile Fish" Journal of Hellenic Studies 4 (1974), p. 173.
  • Longrigg, J. "The ‘Roots of All Things’" Isis 67 (1976), pp. 420-438.
  • Lüth, J. C. Die Struktur des Wirklichen im empedokleischen System Meisenheim am Glam: Anton Hain, 1970.
  • Mansfield, J. "Ambiguity in Empedocles B17.3-5: A Suggestion" Phronesis 17 (1972), pp. 17–39.
  • Mansfield, J. "Critical Note: Empedocles and His Interpreters" Phronesis 39 (1994), pp. 109–115.
  • Marsoner, A. "Sul fr. 128 di Empedocles" Annali dell Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia della Università di Napoli 15 (1972-1973), pp. 5–10.
  • Martin, A. and O. Primavesi. L’Empédocle de Strasbourg. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1999.
  • Martin, H. "Plutarch’s Citation of Empedocles at Amatorius 756d" Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 10 (1969), pp. 57–70.
  • McGibbon, D. "Metempsychosis in Pindar" Phronesis 9 (1964), pp. 5–12.
  • Millerd, C. E. On the Interpretation of Empedocles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1908.
  • Minar, E. L. "Cosmic Periods in the Philosophy of Empedocles" Phronesis 8 (1963), pp. 127–145.
  • Minz, H. Anfänge des Naturrechts bei Empedokles, und ein Vergleich mit dem Naturrecht des Sophisten Antiphons. Dissertation of the University of Köln. Druck: G. Menden, Bonn, 1960.
  • Mourelatos, A. P. D. "Quality, Structure, and Emergence in Later Presocratic Philosophy" pp. 127– 194 in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy vol. 2, ed. J. Cleary, Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1987.
  • Mourelatos, A. P. D. ed. The Pre Socratics. Garden City, N. Y.: Anchor/Doubleday, 1974.
  • Mühl, M. "Über die Missgeschöpfe bei Empedokles" Rheinisches Museum 114 (1971), pp. 289–296.
  • Müller, C. W. Gleiches zu Gleiche ein Prinzip freuhgriechischen Denkens. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz, 1965.
  • Mugler, C. "Sur quelques fragments d’Empédocle" Revue de Philologie 25 (1951), pp. 33–65.
  • Mugler, C. Le vide des atomists et les pores d’Empédocle" Revue de Philologie 41(1967), pp. 217–224.
  • Mullach, F. W. A. Fragmenta Philosophorum Graecorum(rec., uertit, adnot,…). Vol I Paris, 1860; Empedocle, pp. xiii-xvii and 1-80.
  • Munding, H. "Zur Beweisführing des Empedokles" Hermes 82 (1954), pp. 129–145.
  • Nélod, G. Empédocle d’Agrigente. Brussels, 1959; see also Gnomon 38 (1966), pp. 725–727.
  • Nestle, W. Der Dualismus des Empedokles" Philologus 65 (1906), pp. 545–557.
  • Nussbaum, M. C. "Aruistotle on Teleological Explanation" pp. 59–106 in Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.
  • Nussbaum, M. C. Comment on Mourelatos, pp. 195–207 in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy vol. 2, ed. J. Cleary. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1987.
  • O’Brien, D. "Empedocles fr. 35.14-15." Classical Review 15 (1965), pp. 1–4.
  • O’Brien, D. "Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle" Classical Quarterly 17 (1967), pp. 29–40.
  • O’Brien, D. "Empedocles Theories of Seeing and Breathing" Journal of Hellenic Studies 90 (1970), pp. 140–179.
  • O’Brien, D. Empedocles Cosmic Cycle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
  • O’Brien, D. "Hermann Diels on the Prescocratics: Empedocles’ Double Destruction of the Cosmos (Aetius ii 4.8)" Phronesis 45 (2000), pp. 1-18.
  • O’Brien, D. Pour interpreter Empédocle. Leiden: Brill, 1981 (=Philosophia Antiqua 38).
  • O’Brien, D. "The Effect of a Simile: Empedocles’ Theories of Seeing" Journal of Hellenic Studies 90 (1970), pp. 140–179.
  • O’Brien, D. "The Relation of Empedocles and Anaxagoras" Journal of Hellenic Studies 88 (1968), pp. 93–113.
  • O’Brien, D. Empedocle's cosmic cycle, Cambridge 1969
  • Osborne, C. "Empedocles Recycled" Classical Quarterly 37 (1987), pp. 24–50.
  • Osborne, C. Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Prescocratics. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1987.
  • Owen, G. E. L. "Eleatic Questions" Classical Quarterly 10 (1960), pp. 84–102; repr. in Logic, Science, and Dialectic ed. M. Nussbaum, ch. 1. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1986.
  • Owen, G.E L "Plato and Parmenides on the Timeless Present" The Monist 50 (1966), pp. 317–340; repr. in Logic, Science, and Dialectic ed. M. Nussbaum, ch. 2. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1986.
  • Owens, J. "Aristotle on Empedocles Fr. 8" Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supp. vol. 2 (1976), pp. 87–100.
  • Panzerbeiter, F. "Beiträge zur Kritik und Erklärung des Empedokles" Gymnasialprogram Meiningen (1844) 35p.
  • Pasquali, G. "Doxographica aus Basiliusscholien" Nachrichten von der könglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 1910, pp. 194–228.
  • Peyron, A. Empedoclis et Parmenedis Fragmenta ex Codice Taurinensis. Leipzig: Wiegel, 1810.
  • Pfligersdorffer, Georg. Studien zu Poseidonios in Sitzungsberichteder der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosofisch-historische Klasse, Band 232, Abhandlung 5, 1959, pp. 100–131.
  • Powell, J. U. "The Simile of the Clepsydra in Empedocles" Classical Quarterly 17 (1923), pp. 172–174.
  • Prier, R. A. "Empedocles 17.1-13" Platon 28 (1976), pp. 214–223.
  • Rathmann, W. Quaestiones Pythagoreae Empedocleae. Halle: E. Klinz, 1933.
  • Reiche, Harald Anton Thrap. Empedocles’ Mixture, Eudoxon Astronomy, and Aristotle’s connate pneuma. Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert, 1960.
  • Reinhardt, K. "Empedokles Orphiker und Physiker" Classical Philology 445 (1950), pp. 170–179..
  • Riedweg, C. "Orphisches bei Empedocles" Antike und Abendland 4x (1995), pp. 34–59.
  • Roesler, W. "Der Anfang der Katharmoi des Empedokles" Hermes 111 (1983), pp. 170–179.
  • Rostagni, A. "Il poema sacro di Empedocle" Revista di Filologia e di Instruzione Classica 1 (1923), pp. 7–39.
  • Rudberg, G. "Empedokles und Evolution" Eranos 50 (1952), pp. 23–30.
  • Schmalzriedt, E. Peri Phuseos: Zur Frühgeschicte der Buchtitel. Munich: Fink, 1970.
  • Schneidewin, F. W. "Neue Verse des Empedokles" Philologus 6 (1851), pp. 155–167.
  • Schwabl, H. "Empedokles fr. B110" Wiener Studien 69 (1956), pp. 49–56.
  • Schwabl, H. "Zur ‘Theogonie’ bei Parmenides und Empedokles" Wiener Studien 70 (1957), pp. 278–289.
  • Sedley, D. N. "Empedocles Theory of Vision and Theophrastus’ De Sensibus" in Fortenbaugh, W.W. and D. Gutas, eds. Theophrastus. His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings. New Brunswick/London, 1992. pp. 20–31.
  • Sedley, D. N. "The Proems of Empedocles and Lucretius" Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 30 (1989), pp. 269–296.
  • Seeck, G. A. "Empedokles B 17.9-13, B 8, B100 bei Aristoteles" Hermes 95 (1967), pp. 28–53.
  • Sider, D. "Empedokles ‘Persika’" Ancient Philosophy 2 (1982), pp. 76-78.
  • Sider, D. "Empedocles B 96 (462 Bollack) and the Poetry of Adhesion" Mnemosyne 37 (1984), pp. 14–24.
  • Snell, B. "Hera als Erdgöttin" Philologus 96 (1943), pp. 159–160.
  • Solmsen, F.: "Love and Strife in Empedocles' Cosmology", (1965), Phronesis 10, 109-148 = in: uő. Kleine Schriften I, Hildesheim, 1968, 274-313.
  • Solmsen, F. "nώρÊς in Empedocles" Classical Review 17 (1967), pp. 245–246.
  • Solmsen, F. "Eternal and Temporary Beings in Empedocles’ Physical Poem" Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 57 (1975), pp. 123–145.
  • Solmsen, F. "Empedocles’ Hymn to Apollo" Phronesis 25 (1980), pp. 219–227.
  • Sorabji, R. Necessity, Cause, and Blame. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980.
  • Sorabji, R. Matter, Space, and Motion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.
  • Steiger, K.. the Cosmology of Parmenides and Empedocles" Homonoia 2(1980), pp. 159–165.
  • Stein, H. Empedocles Agrigentinus Fragmenta Bonn: A. Marcus, 1852.
  • Stern, S. M. Article on Empedocles in The Encyclopedia of Islam, new edition, s. v. Anbadu"lis, 1960 vol I, pp. 483–484.
  • Sturz, F. G. Empedocles Agrigentinus…Leipzig: Göschen, 1805.
  • Taillardat. " Le sens d’ ‘amorgos’ (Empedocle fr. 84 Diels 7) et les lanternes dans l’antiquité" Revue des Études Grecques 72(1959), pp. xi-xii.
  • Ten Brinlk, B. "Empedoclea" (letter to Schneidewin) Philologus 6 (1851), pp. 730–734.
  • Thiele, G. "Zu den vier Elemente des Empedokles" Hermes 32 (1897), pp. 68–78.
  • Thomas, F. Sprachliche Untersuchungen zu Empedokles. Dissertation. Leipzig, 1924.
  • Tigner, S. S. "Empedocles’ Twirled Ladle and the Vortex-supported Earth" Isis 65 (1974), pp. 433–447.
  • Timpanaro-Cardini, M. "La clessidra di Empedocle e l’esperienza di Torricelli" Convegno di Studi Torricelliani. Faenza, 1958, pp. 151–156.
  • Timpanaro-Cardini, M. La zoogonia di Empedoclee la critica aristotelica" Physis 2 (1960), pp. 5–13.
  • Timpanaro-Cardini, M. "Respirazione e clessidra" Parola del passato 12 (1957), pp. 250–270.
  • Timpanaro-Cardinin, M. ed. and tr. Pseudo-Aristotle De Lineis Insecabilibus. Varese: Istituto editoriale cisalpino, 1970.
  • Traglia, A. Studi sulla lingus di Empedocle. Bari: Adriatica, 1952.
  • Trepanier, S. Empedocles: An Interpretation (Studies in Classics-Outstandingdissertations) Routledge; 1. edition (January 5, 2004)
  • Tucker, G. M. "Empedocles in Exile" Classical Review 45 (1931), pp. 49–51.
  • Van der Ben, N. The Proem of Empedocles’ Peri Physios. Amsterdam: Gruener, 1975.
  • Van der Ben, N. "Empedocles’ Fragments 8, 9, 10 DK" Phronesis 23 (1978), pp. 197–215.
  • Van Groningen, B. A. "Le fragment 111 d’Empédoclé" Classica et Mediaevalia 17 (1956), pp. 47–61.
  • Van Groningen, B. A. "Trois notes sur Empédocle" Mnemosyne 9 (1956), pp. 221–224.
  • Van Groningen, B. A. "Empédocle poète" Mnemosyne 24 (1971), pp. 169–188.
  • Verdenius, W. J. "Empedocles’ Doctrine of Sight" pp. 155–164 in Studia Vollgraff oblata. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1948.
  • Verdenius, W. J. "Notes on the Presocratics, VIII, The Meaning of 1ίστoς in Empedocles; IX, Empedocles Frag. 26,2" Mneomsyne s. IV, vol I (1948), pp. 10–14.
  • Von Arnim, H. "Weltperioden bei Empedokles" pp. 16–27 in Festschrift Gomperz. Vienna: A. Hoelder, 1902.
  • Von Fritz, K. "rστρoς rrDτrρωPo in Pindar’s Second Olympian and Pythagoras’ Theory of Metempsychosis" Phronesis 2 (1957) pp. 85–94.
  • Wenksus, O. "Empedokles Erklärung des Entstehung der Sonnenfinsternisse. Das Fragment DK 31B42" Hermes 108 (1980), pp. 243–248.
  • West, M. L. "Empedocles on Papyrus" Classical Review 12 (1962), p. 120.
  • West, M. L. "Notes on Newly Discovered Fragments of Greek Authors" Maia 20 (1968), pp. 199–200.
  • West, M. L. "nωρός in Empedocles" Classical Review 16 (1966), pp. 135–136.
  • Wicken, J. S. "Chance Necessity, and Purpose: Toward a Philosophy of Evolution" Zygon 16 (1981), pp. 97–101.
  • Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, U. von "Die Katharmoi des Empedokles" Sitzungsberichte der Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften 94(1929), pp. 626–661; repr. in Kleine Schhriften. pp. 473–521 (Berlin: Weidmann, 1935).
  • Wilamowitz-Mollendorf, U. von "Lesefrüchte" Hermes 65 (1930), pp. 245–250.
  • Wilkens, K. "Wie hat Empedokles die Vorgänge in der Klepsydra erklärt?" Hermes 95 ((1967), pp. 129–140.
  • Wisniewski, B. "Quaestiones Empedocleae" Parola del Passato 29 (1974), pp. 158–171.
  • Woodbury, L. "Equinox at Acragas" TAPA 97 (1966), pp. 597–616.
  • Worthen, T. "Pneumatic Action in the Klepsydra and Empedocles’ Account" Isis 61 (1970), pp. 520–530.
  • Wright, M. R. Empedocles: The Extant Fragments. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1981.
  • Zafiropoulo, J. Empédocle d’Agrigente. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1953.
  • Zuntz, G. "De Empedoclis librorum numero coniectura" Mnemosyne 18 (1965), p. 365.
  • Zuntz, G. "Empedokles fr. 137" Wiener Studien 79 (1966), pp. 38–44.
  • Zuntz, G. Persephone: Three Essays on Religion and Thought in Magna Graecia. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971

Magyar nyelvű bibliográfia[szerkesztés]

  • Steiger Kornél: Parmenidész és Empedoklész kozmológiája, Budapest, Áron Kiadó, 1998;
  • Steiger Kornél: A lappangó örökség (Fejezetek a preszókratikus filozófia antik hagyományozásának történetéből), Budapest, Jószöveg Műhely, 1999;
  • Kirk, G. S. – Raven J. E. – Schofield, M.: A preszókratikus filozófusok (ford. Cziszter Kálmán és Steiger Kornél), Atlantisz Könyvkiadó, 1998;
  • Görög Gondolkodók II. Empedoklésztól Démokritoszig; Kossuth Könyvkiadó, 1996;
  • Betegh Gábor: A Strasbourgi Empedoklész-papirusz, In. Magyar Filozófiai Szemle, 1999. 6.
  • Luciano De Crescenzo: A görög filozófia rendhagyó története. Ford. Peredi Mária. Tercium Kiadó. 1995. ISBN 963-8453-443